[Bizgres-general] Is Bizgres dead?

[niranjan sathe]

*I'd assumed it was a single-company open source project, but I think
there's enough interest to have a general open source effort now.
--*No Simon,I am waiting for Bizgres 1.0 for more than one year and already
had good list of candidate implemetations...
But typically in Open source projects I cannot complain about release dealys
- if someone is really concerned; he should take it on by himself.
Here,I am helpless because C/C++ programming with Postgres codebase is far
different than building datawarehouses !
Regards,
Niranjan

On 2/28/08, Simon Riggs <simon at 2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:42 -0800, Seth Grimes wrote:
> > There hasn't been a new Bizgres release since 0.9, a Beta based on
> > PostgreSQL 8.1.3 that came out in April 2006.  Is Bizgres dead, or is an
> > update/production release in the works, perhaps like Greenplum 3 based
> on
> > PostgreSQL 8.2.4?  There were a couple of April 2007 list messages
> titled
> > "Bizgres update to use postgres 8.2 codebase underway."  Did that work
> > stall or is it progressing?
> >
> > If you're using open-source Bizgres for significant production
> > applications, how is it working for you?
>
> Good question.
>
> I'd assumed it was a single-company open source project, but I think
> there's enough interest to have a general open source effort now.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> 2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bizgres-general mailing list
> Bizgres-general at pgfoundry.org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/bizgres-general
>



-- 
|| उत्तिष्ठत, जाग्रत, प्राप्त वरानी बोधत ||
(Awake.. Arise.. Explore the gifts you already have)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/bizgres-general/attachments/20080228/e1e227d7/attachment.html>